Australia's feel-good Harmony Day celebrations avoid the harder truths about racism in this country
The United Nations established the 21st of March as the International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination following one of the most brutal acts of racial violence in modern history. That Australia has reframed the day as ‘Harmony Day’ reflects our inability to honestly confront racism in this country, writes Gloria Tabi.
Pieces like this one are free to read. Please consider becoming a paid subscriber so Cheek can continue paying writers for their insight and expertise.
Every year on March 21, Australians are encouraged to wear orange. Schools hold assemblies. Children share food from different cultures. Posters celebrate diversity with cheerful slogans about belonging.
It is called Harmony Day, a moment to celebrate multicultural Australia. But the global meaning of March 21 tells a very different story.
Across the world, the date marks the International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, established by the United Nations after one of the most brutal acts of racial violence in modern history.
On 21 March 1960, thousands of Black South Africans gathered in the township of Sharpeville to protest apartheid laws that restricted their movement and enforced a system of racial control. The protest was peaceful. Police opened fire. Sixty-nine people were killed. Many were shot in the back while running away.
The Sharpeville massacre shocked the international community and exposed the violence required to sustain a racist system. In response, the United Nations declared March 21 a Global Day of Commitment to eliminating racial discrimination. The purpose of the day was clear: to confront racism directly, not soften it.
Yet, in Australia, that meaning has largely disappeared. Instead, March 21 has been reframed as Harmony Day, a celebration of multiculturalism that focuses on unity and togetherness. The shift may appear harmless. But language shapes how societies understand problems, and Harmony Day reflects something deeper about how Australia prefers to talk about race. Put simply, Australia struggles to name racism.
Rather than confronting racism as a structural problem rooted in history and institutions, national conversations often shift quickly toward the softer language of diversity, inclusion and harmony. But harmony without honesty becomes avoidance.
Australia’s colonial history is central to this pattern. The nation was built on the violent dispossession of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and on racial hierarchies that shaped immigration policy, labour markets and social status. For decades, the White Australia policy explicitly restricted who could belong.
Although those laws were dismantled, the legacy of that thinking still influences how race is discussed today.
Multiculturalism is celebrated in modern Australia, but often on an unspoken condition: assimilation. Migrants who adapt quickly and avoid challenging dominant cultural norms are seen as hardworking. Frequently praised as model citizens, they become examples of the “good immigrant” who fits neatly into the national story. Meanwhile, those who speak about the realities of racism, who refuse to soften the truth for comfort, are often labelled “difficult”.
So, Harmony Day has become a celebration that can come with a quiet expectation: blend in, succeed quietly, and do not disrupt the ‘harmony’ by speaking about racism. When racism is raised, the response is often discomfort or defensiveness. That discomfort has consequences.
Research from the Scanlon Foundation’s Mapping Social Cohesion survey shows that around six in ten Australians believe racism is a serious problem in Australia, despite the national preference to talk about “harmony” instead. For many people from racialised communities, the reality is not abstract; it is part of daily life.
Racism appears in casual street slurs and workplace discrimination, but it also exists within institutions. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, for example, make up around three per cent of the national population but more than twenty per cent of the prison population, a disparity widely recognised as evidence of systemic inequality. Studies of Indigenous employees in the public service have also documented experiences of exclusion and racism that push many out of their careers entirely. These realities sit uneasily beside the national image of harmonious multiculturalism. And that is precisely why the framing of March 21 matters.
When the day becomes solely about celebrating diversity, the difficult history that inspired it disappears. The conversation moves away from confronting racism and toward reassuring ourselves that we are already doing well. But avoiding the word racism does not make racism disappear. If anything, the reluctance to name the problem can make it harder to address.
In a multicultural country like Australia, that avoidance carries risks. Racism does not vanish simply because it is not discussed. It accumulates quietly, in institutions, policies and everyday interactions, until tensions surface in ways that societies are unprepared to handle.
History offers plenty of warnings about what happens when racial inequality is ignored for too long. The Sharpeville massacre was one such warning. It showed how systems built on racial hierarchy can eventually produce violence when grievances are suppressed, and voices are silenced.
Recognising the full meaning of March 21 is not about importing someone else’s history into Australia’s story. It is about acknowledging that racism is not only a problem elsewhere. Australia’s multicultural success will not be measured by how enthusiastically we celebrate harmony, but by how honestly we confront injustice. Because genuine harmony cannot exist without justice.
Justice begins with a simple step: naming racism when we see it. First Nations call this truth-telling. So, let’s acknowledge March 21, its full name: the International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, because we can’t fix a problem we can’t name.
If you are based in Sydney, The Blak Caucus are organising a March Against Racism on Saturday 21 March to mark the day’s actual meaning. The protest will begin at 12PM in Hyde Park, and march onwards to the Sydney Opera House.
About the author
Gloria Tabi
Gloria is an author, researcher, and TEDx speaker whose work sits at the intersection of race, gender, and belonging. As the founder of Everyday Inclusion, she helps leaders move beyond performative Diversity and Inclusion to build workplaces grounded in equity and justice. Born in Ghana and shaped by life in Australia, Gloria also leads Enable Women Africa, inspiring hair freedom, challenging hair discrimination, and redefining what professionalism looks like. You can find Gloria on Instagram, at @gloriabinks.
 | A guest post by
|
Avoiding the word racism doesn’t make it disappear; it makes it harder to deal with.
It’s similar to talking about “celebrating women” without naming violence against women. Celebration matters, but if we refuse to acknowledge the harm, we delay the action needed to address it.
That’s what’s happening with March 21.
By calling it Harmony Day, we shift the focus from confronting racism to celebrating diversity. One is comfortable. The other is necessary.
But if we don’t pause to name and address racism when we’re meant to, we risk allowing it to grow quietly; until it shows up in ways we are far less prepared to handle.
Naming the problem isn’t divisive.
It’s how we begin to solve it.
This is such a great article - thank you. It articulates the issue so beautifully. Most people want Harmony, but ignoring reality doesn’t get us there.