Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael's avatar

The article makes several extraordinarily important omissions. Firstly, it omits to mention the value of the corporate income tax that the gas exporters pay. For example, Woodside paid more that $2 billion of taxes in 2025 and had an effective tax rate of 45%. Its $2.1 billion dividend paid was full franked. The much maligned PRRT is better designed than this author gives it credit. Most of the gas fields exporting from Australia are in their very early stages of production or have only begun to approach their peak and amortise their set up costs. This means that in the coming years, the existing PRRT take will, assuming a reasonably stable gas price, increase at a compound rate. As will the corporate tax take as depreciation allowances fall. Australia needs to ensure that foreign owned companies pay the correct amount of corporate income tax. However a royalty of the size discussed will have similar results to the royalty on coal in QLD.......where mines are closing, jobs are being lost and no more taxes are being paid. The establishent and operating costs of the gas export fields and facilities are of far greater magnitude than those often referred to adjacent to Norway. This is often overlooked in the emotion surrounding this issue.

Beth's avatar

Praying this gets the bipartisan support it desperately needs

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?